Balancing Traceability and Authentication: Challenges for Governments and Manufacturers

There is a common belief that traceability solutions alone will eliminate counterfeiting and simplify product authentication. However, while item-level traceability enhances product transparency, the most commonly adopted technologies come with vulnerabilities, especially in terms of authentication.

In industries such as cosmetics, pharmaceuticals, tobacco, and food and beverage, traceability is used to track the history, location, and movement of a product throughout its supply chain.

This is often driven by changes in market regulations, pushed by governments to enhance transparency for consumers and to improve oversight of manufacturing and delivery for fiscal and regulatory purposes.

Traceability typically relies on a unique identifier that is attached to a product to allow the movement of the product to be tracked through various stages of production, distribution, and retail. Scanning these identifiers at key points in the supply chain creates a digital ‘trace’ of the product’s journey.

These identifiers can take several forms: 

  • Alphanumeric codes: a sequence of letters and numbers, allowing for a wide range of possible combinations.
  • Barcodes (1D and 2D): from the simple linear types to QR codes and DataMatrix, barcodes can store a higher amount of data than simple alphanumeric codes. They can be directly marked on a product or packaging or printed on a label.
  • RFID tags: radio frequency identification (RFID) tags can provide real-time tracking and store more information than traditional barcodes. They enable automated tracking without the need for line-of-sight scanning, enhancing efficiency in inventory management. Tags can be integrated discreetly into products and read using dedicated smartphone applications through an NFC reader. As they don’t require line-of-sight to be read, they can be inserted inside a product or product packaging.

Currently, 99% of industries rely on alphanumeric codes and barcodes because they are cost-effective and easily integrated into existing manufacturing lines, which are typically equipped with printing heads for product customisation.

However, as already mentioned, these technologies come with vulnerabilities: 

Barcodes and serial numbers

  • Lack of security: they can be easily replicated and copied for replication on a counterfeit product with no need to decrypt/encrypt the information.
  • Scanning errors: barcodes and serial numbers require line of sight to work, which can represent an important challenge in reading the codes. In addition, damages to the code or poor scanning conditions can lead to misidentification.
  • No embedded authentication: barcodes are usually not secured and use open-source technologies.
  • Limited data: barcode data capacity is limited to the size of the code itself which is then limited by the available real estate on the product and by aesthetics criteria.

RFID tags

  • Security concerns: depending on the type of electronic chip and its implementation, low-end RFID tags can be susceptible to cloning and unauthorised reading, which poses risks for data security and authenticity.
  • Interference: physical barriers and electronic interference can affect the readability of RFID tags.
  • Read range: the effective read range can be limited, particularly for passive RFID tags, which can affect tracking in large spaces or complex environments.
  • Cost: electronic chip acquisition and integration costs may prove to be a barrier for some classes of product.

Improving product security through authentication features 

To enhance product security, traceability systems must be integrated with additional authentication features that can be easily recognised by the human eye and verified through mobile apps or dedicated devices.

Examples of such features include digital proprietary codes,security labels/stamps, and secure RFID tags.

While these authentication technologies offer powerful solutions, their integration into large-scale manufacturing operations presents a set of unique challenges.

The challenges of mass production and customisation

The adoption of authentication features often requires significant customisation to meet specific industry or customer needs.

This is particularly true in mass production environments where manufacturers produce billions of units annually. Customising each unit with unique security features can slow down production, increase manufacturing costs, and complicate logistics.

For example, integrating RFID tags into every product or batch of products requires additional equipment, specialised personnel, and time. While the need for security is clear, balancing this with the demands of high-volume production is a delicate paradox. Manufacturers must weigh the importance of preventing counterfeiting against the efficiency of mass production – a tension that can delay adoption of security features across the supply chain.

A holistic approach to product security 

Given these complexities, a holistic approach to product security is necessary.

While traceability provides valuable information about a product’s journey, it cannot guarantee authenticity on its own. Counterfeiters are increasingly sophisticated, and traditional traceability methods alone are often insufficient.

To effectively combat counterfeiting, governments and industries must collaborate to integrate traceability with advanced authentication technologies. A one-size-fits-all solution is not feasible due to the unique needs and vulnerabilities of different industries.

For instance, in pharmaceuticals, where counterfeit drugs can have life-threatening consequences, tamper-evident packaging and encrypted codes may be required.

In contrast, industries like consumer electronics might adopt simpler solutions like RFID tags or QR codes.

Overcoming manufacturing challenges 

To mitigate the impact of authentication features on production, manufacturers can explore several strategies:

  • Automation and AI integration: leveraging automation and artificial intelligence can streamline the integration of authentication features, minimising human error and optimising production efficiency.
  • Modular solutions: developing modular, customisable security solutions that can be adapted to different product lines or regions could reduce the cost and complexity of integration. For example, encrypted codes can be easily integrated into existing production lines or RFID systems could be implemented on a regional basis or for specific product categories rather than across the entire product line.
  • Collaboration with third-party experts: manufacturers could collaborate with specialised security technology providers who offer scalable solutions that meet industry-specific needs while keeping costs manageable.
  • The role of government and industry collaboration: Governments play a key role in ensuring product authenticity. They must not only enforce regulations but also create an environment that encourages innovation in authentication technologies. By working with industries to set global standards and providing incentives for research and development, governments can foster a more coordinated, effective approach to combating counterfeiting.

Simultaneously, industries must continue to invest in scalable, cost-effective solutions that meet their unique security needs. A combination of traceability and authentication will be critical in protecting consumers and ensuring the integrity of global supply chains.

Conclusion: a multifaceted solution for the future

Improving product security requires a collective effort from governments, industries, and consumers.

A combination of traceability and advanced authentication technologies is essential for tackling the growing threat of counterfeiting.

While there are challenges – particularly in cost, customisation, and production efficiency – the benefits of implementing these systems far outweigh the risks of inaction.

By fostering collaboration and investing in scalable solutions, we can create a secure, transparent marketplace that protects both consumers and businesses. The future of product security lies in integrating technologies that are adaptable, scalable, and capable of ensuring the authenticity of products in an increasingly complex global economy.


Treegen is an independent consulting firm specialising in the security industry, with a focus on identity and value document protection, banknote protection, brand protection, and traceability and digital authentication. Treegen’s services cater to governmental entities, central banks, security printing houses, solution providers, financial investors, and brand owners.

https://treegen.co/